The concept you've described, "Meta-Organizational Intelligence," is intriguing and potentially valuable. It highlights the strategic importance of partnerships between organizations in leveraging advanced technologies like GPUs and deep data to achieve global and local impact.
Here's a breakdown of the key elements you've mentioned:
- Purposeful/Intel Design: This suggests a deliberate and strategic approach to forming partnerships, considering long-term goals and potential benefits.
- Global and Deep Local Impacts: This emphasizes the desire to achieve both broad reach and targeted influence in specific regions or communities.
- Leveraging GPUs and Deep Data: This highlights the importance of advanced technologies in enabling new capabilities and driving innovation.
Based on these elements, the term "Meta-Organizational Intelligence" seems appropriate. It conveys the idea of a higher-level strategic thinking that goes beyond traditional organizational boundaries to harness the power of technology and collaboration.
However, it might be helpful to consider the following points:
- Clarity and Specificity: Ensure that the term is clearly defined and understood by others. It might be beneficial to provide more specific examples or case studies to illustrate the concept.
- Differentiation: How does "Meta-Organizational Intelligence" differ from existing concepts like "strategic alliances," "partnerships," or "synergies"? What unique aspects does it emphasize?
- Measurability: Consider how to measure or assess the effectiveness of meta-organizational intelligence. What metrics or indicators could be used to track progress and success?
