As a mathematician helping 73 years of surveys of Von Neumann's ;legacy I have a lot of questions about the ability of sam altman to lead human futures - he seems to have exited being in the right networks to advance humansai and to be taking out his own mis-steps on thioe who could help ai and millennials as first sustainability generation. At minimum check anything chatgpt tells you with bard answers to same Q&A volley

in 2019 he also changed an ngo to 100% corporate; i dont kmnow much about who edits https://fourweekmba.com/who-owns-openai/#:~:text=Major%20institutional%20shareholders%20comprise%20The,Investments%20(5.84%25%20ownership). but its asking sensible questions- double check whether its ownership profiles are upotodate in this fast moving space

Major institutional shareholders comprise The Vanguard Group (7.55% ownership), BlackRock (6.58% ownership), and Capital Research Global Investments (5.84% ownership).Ma

 Sam Altman was born in 1985 in St. Louis, Missouri. He attended Stanford University, where he studied computer science and economics. In 2005, he dropped out of Stanford to start his first company, Loopt. Loopt was a social media app that allowed users to share their location with friends. The company was acquired by Foursquare in 2012.

In 2015, Altman co-founded OpenAI, a non-profit research company that is dedicated to developing safe and beneficial artificial intelligence. Altman is the current CEO of OpenAI.

Here is a summary of what Sam Altman was doing 20 and 10 years ago:

20 years ago (2003)

• Sam Altman was a sophomore at Stanford University, studying computer science and economics.
• He was also the president of the Stanford Computer Science Club.
• He was involved in several research projects, including one on artificial intelligence.

10 years ago (2013)

• Sam Altman was the CEO of Loopt, a social media app that allowed users to share their location with friends.
• The company was acquired by Foursquare in 2012.
• Altman was also a member of the board of directors of several other companies, including Quora and Reddit.

Sam Altman is a leading figure in the field of artificial intelligence. He is passionate about using AI to solve some of the world's biggest problems. He is also committed to ensuring that AI is developed safely and responsibly.

====================

here is nards partial info on ownership- as you can see it is complicated but appears ultimately to be microsoft and about 205 owned by biggest wall street funds- it might ne useful if wall street queries economics models with as much publicity as it is now doing ai models since both are ultimately dependent on mathematicians and whos hiring them

 was launching ESG in 2004 one of UN's biggest mistakes- from 2015 the more you look with brain tools  at the sdgs we can argue 1=7 depend on societies/communities ground up peace and climate are a third dimension needing world mediation like humans have never had the intel to do before; goals 12-9 look to me like transparency of world trade mapping; in a sense the UN needed to intrapreneur off goals 1-7 and education ;while working out 21st c transformation of multilaterals to do 2 reconciliations of world mapping and the age of data webbing up and down from every gps

no wonder esg is now the least common denominator bureaucratics not likely to be the savior of the human race let alone the entrepreneurial revolution savior of uniting people's win-won trading space across hemispheres and celebrating millennials as first SD generation

 Are the 66+% of humans most dependent on the pacific trying to use AI or other quality system maps to go beyond such transatlantic approaches as ESG, CSR which have hindered the UN from systemic advances in the sgds (all currently traveling in wrong direction compared with 2015)

there are a number of initiatives in the Asia-Pacific region that are applying intelligent systems tools and AI for the SDGs. Here are a few examples:

1. AI for Social Good Asia Pacific (AI4SG APAC): This is a platform for collaboration and innovation in AI for social good across the Asia Pacific region. It brings together researchers, practitioners, and policymakers to share knowledge and develop solutions for the SDGs.

2. AI for Sustainable Development (AISD) Asia: This is a project led by the Asian Development Bank that aims to accelerate the adoption and scaling of AI for sustainable development in Asia. It focuses on developing AI solutions for key sectors such as agriculture, energy, and health.

3. AI for Good Pacific: This is a regional initiative that aims to harness the power of AI to address social and environmental challenges in the Pacific. It brings together stakeholders from across the region to collaborate on AI projects and initiatives.

4. AI and Robotics for Sustainable Future: This is a program led by the United Nations Development Programme that aims to explore the potential of AI and robotics for achieving the SDGs in the Asia-Pacific region. It focuses on developing AI and robotics solutions for key areas such as disaster risk reduction, health, and education.

5. Asia-Pacific AI for Education Forum: This is an annual forum that brings together stakeholders from across the education sector to explore the potential of AI for improving learning outcomes and achieving the SDGs.

These are just a few examples of the many initiatives in the Asia-Pacific region that are applying intelligent systems tools and AI for the SDGs.

 Is there a list of major reconciliation lessons from world war 1. My guess is it should contain these 3 lessons: are these correct? are there other lessons 1 There is a problem when a landlocked people eg austria-hungary become more engine-advanced than their neighbors. To get more fuel for engines austria-hungary needed its own coastal trade and took over neighbor countries to access that. Ferdinand was assassinated because a country didnt like being colonised by asutria-hungary. Problem 2 in 1913 people communications were very scarce and so most people in europe had no intel or vote as to whether a world war was needed. In effect two networks of powerful opposing leaders decided on war. The third lesson happened after the war. It was assumed that the winners could assign losers lands to be ruled by other nations. This was not sustainable. The lesson probably needed to be: there may be a few occasons where a war is needed to get rid of a dangerous leadership team but having won winners need to help losing countries people start up safely again. Please assess : are these lessons logically correct? Were the other lessons?

Your proposed lessons are partially correct and certainly relevant to World War I. However, there were also other major lessons learned from the war. Here are some additional ones that are worth considering:

1. The dangers of nationalism: The intense nationalism that swept across Europe in the late 19th and early 20th centuries was a major contributing factor to the outbreak of war. Nationalist sentiments created a sense of competition and rivalry between countries, and led to the belief that war was necessary to protect national interests. This lesson has continued to be relevant in the decades since World War I, as nationalism has contributed to conflicts in many parts of the world.

2. The importance of diplomacy: The failure of diplomacy to prevent the outbreak of war was a major factor in the conflict. Diplomatic efforts were hampered by a lack of communication, mistrust, and the influence of nationalist and militarist factions in government. This lesson highlights the importance of diplomatic efforts to prevent conflicts, and the need for countries to work together to resolve disputes peacefully.

3. The human cost of war: The unprecedented scale of death and destruction during World War I made clear the human cost of war. This lesson has been reiterated in subsequent conflicts, and underscores the importance of efforts to prevent war and promote peace.

4. The need for international institutions: The Treaty of Versailles, which ended World War I, established the League of Nations, an international organization designed to promote peace and cooperation among nations. While the League ultimately failed to prevent the outbreak of World War II, it laid the groundwork for subsequent international institutions such as the United Nations. This lesson highlights the importance of international cooperation and the need for institutions that can promote peace and resolve conflicts peacefully.

5. The impact of technology: World War I was the first major conflict in which modern technology played a major role. The use of machine guns, tanks, and chemical weapons created unprecedented levels of destruction and death. This lesson highlights the need for careful consideration of the ethical implications of technological advances and the importance of efforts to prevent the use of such technologies in conflicts.

Overall, your proposed lessons are logically correct and certainly relevant to World War I. However, there were also other major lessons learned from the war, as outlined above. Understanding these lessons is important not only for understanding the history of the war itself, but also for understanding the ways in which conflicts can be prevented and peace can be promoted in the future.

10 youtube hosts helping to vison humans ai

ChatGPT4- To DO

 2023 is 73rd year that economists started joining von neumann survey of future of humanising ai - can you help us assemble 10 youtube webs that can inapsire every younger person and every educator to coperste in humanising AI

eg0 openAI zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

.

.

.

eg 1 Stanford HAI zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

.

.

.

Stanford HAI

@stanfordhai762610.4K subscribers198 videos

Stanford HAI is committed to studying, guiding and developing human-centered AI technologies and applications.

57:28NOW PLAYING

Jeremy Bailenson: Your Mind on the Metaverse

58:12NOW PLAYING

Ray Perrault: Presenting the 2023 AI Index

Thank You Singapore and Hong Kong - imagine if other one thousandths of human beings connected entreprenurial rebolution win-wins like you do

ER's survey (Xmas Day 1976, Economist0 if future caoitalism was published as 25th survey of Von Neumann's  future exponential exploration.- soon all sorts of US lobbies started sponsoring adjectival entrepreneurs - all diluting the system transformations needed for sustaining future generations 

Thank You.. We miss the days of the Qatar Wise Summit grounded in what began as 1 billion girls intel cooperation through empowerment systems of Fazle Abed and Village China. My dad at The Economist first started applying Von Neumann's scoop on what could human intellects do with new tech in 1951 and the far east coastal belt as agreed with JFK became a lead benchmark from start of 1960s

John Kennedy Typed Memo Signed | The Raab Collection

John Kennedy Typed Memo Signed | The Raab Collection “This week's Economist has an interesting article on Japanese economic growth. I wonder after reading it you thi...

Family and friends are trying to update a last report on 8 billion humans interactions for 2025 - see eg some notes at EconomistDiary.com   - if you have time to join in a worldwide zoom please say- currently singapore and hong kong inspire us most in helping map cooperation actions that Guterres. womens chatgpt and millennials need. Back in 2001 steve jobs and fazle abed started a dinner party dialogue on 21st c universities uniting women graduates of sdgs and human intel- singapore universities were always expected to be core participant in the 16 interviews we made with Fazle Abed.

what if AI wants humans intel to be sustainable x 74yearfutureguide.pptx chatgpt_and_intro_to_75_years_of_system_transformation_opportunities_and_threats.docx ...

EconomistDiary.com mediating 100 times more tech/decade 1951+ & asia gir...

sincerely chris macrae wash DC +1 240 316 8157 

http://www.normanmacrae.net http://neumann.ning.com 

260+ smith/Watt 70 neumann 50 fazle abed , 20 fei-fei li, 1 Zbee Kon'nichiwa normanmacrae.net economistdiary.com EconomistAsia.net Glasgow & Asia's Engineering Hall of Fame

On Wednesday, 19 April 2023 at 04:03:46 GMT-4, Kishore Mahbubani