Youth's (and the sustainability generation's) livelihood learning networks and end poverty banking would be much better served if 3 pre-digital systems of urgent human development from the bottom-up were understood first
1 That of sir fazle abed which was primarily about how to sustain finance through 200000 different rural hubs directed at poverty alleviation to maximise local service and life saving knowledge networking (eg how to finance building a rural last mile women empowered health system from nothing)
2 That of muhammad yunus which was primarily about what happens if a small team of young people (maximum 5) go and locate themselves in rural region (ie again with out electricity cut off from all communications except person to person) and serve the financial and livelihood learning needs of 60 by 60 village mothers every week - and the movement is led by a storyteller who convinces people to fund 1500 such pre-digital branches
3 Other local financing for the poor - which when separated from livelihood learning turns out to be purposeless in terms of sustaining generations even if some make quick gains
Whether or not you agree with this statement, this library is dedicated to studying what happened to those who linkein to sir fazle abed's systems of economic development - predigital, transitional and post-digital
zasheem and mostofa i want to know whether you are actively agreeable to the following work:
-we have agreed one collection of papers of sir fazle and one of yunus are to be collected and updated in pdf that can be distributed anywhere and retain some sort of journal cover certified by adam smith scholars run by zasheem since my fathers death in june 2010
first if you have advice on how to change the 3 wordings lets hear it - they will need to be tried out (and chinese translated) on yings students during october at the latest
second from next week on i expect all three of us to share plans-
how will zasheem get adam smith scholars to appraise this and take eg to the lse and debate lord stern or others at the Economist- how will gordon brown or george soros and his youth's new economics networks be be involved
worldwide we need to attack microcredistummit results convergences head on - unless they want to differentiate between these 3 movements they are part of the big banking big education enemy lines (the more so they are in denial (as remains yunus) that is exactly how they have been used politically)- they havent been on the right side on any transition from great manual microcredit networks- thats why brac is the only one left as largest ngo partnership
and its why the chinese (jack ma was very ardent student of bangladesh microcredit from 2007) are very confused about why brac wont give them a tour to 46 years of sir fazle's partnership building into the world largest ngo- is bangladesh deliberately opposing jack ma- here he is signaling his willingness to invest and there is brac erecting a great wall of silos-
while zasheem is in dhaka- can we clarify for the final time- which of the press (eg the people who helped zasheem launch journal of social business) want this view of bangladeshi miracle connected now- which of the 60 best friends of sir fazle in 2012 that the japan embassy did roundtables want this
all of this is urgent in 3 weeks unctad holds its biannual investors summit led by the same kenyan person that is recruiting african and asian youth for jack ma university- but another part of hos teams have just brought out a book sayinig all microcredit was the worst con trick the and complex has ever suffered -when you know what happened to jamii bora in kenya - these ;people have all the evidence of how misapplied ownership of microcredit got
the fact that microcedisummit results convergences abdul latif poverty lab (other yunus supporters) have spent 2 decades ever since start of microcreditsummit not valuing the whole truth of girls end poverty has brought us to the brink of losing humanity livelihood education of youth as sustainability generation everywhere- there is no more time for saying the movement was led by nice ;people like sam daley harris and queen sofia and dr yunus - they all played with fame not with making sure youth alumni understood
please confirm- do you accept this challenge- will you join from =next week on clarifying who we can convert eg adam smith scholars (through the italian principal of glasgow university franciscans) and who we must go to intellectual war with now- if the whole of columbia university needs to be removed - fine! just like tsunghua didnt have a real sme curriculum to ying came but willingly accepted this as the most massive student cooperation- all new york universities have refused to take on the subprime bankers- not even in the developing world- the bubble of the university designed run colonising bureucfragts must end with jack ma's universities linking every city where girls have a future
during this class yer it is not just jack prepping his own study transformation from fintech to edutech - -he and melinda gates led guterres report which is to be circulated to all national leaders at the G100 aka known as belt road 2 beijing april and then aiib takes new development banking to luxembourg for its june summit where lictenstein will present the blockchain law that 100 nations need - if the eu fails to adopt that it will be great to have brexited! lord stern rehearses this at argentina g20 where the un will launch a hitherto secret group called the eminent g20 financial expert group!
it is a pity we couldnt all be discussing this in a 5 day open space in dhaka this week - please attend to this email as if we were all there celebrating each others belief in girl empowerment
