1979 & Proyouth GAMES to Linkin from 1951: Ed's & A!20s most curious moments as V. Neumann's & The Economist's diarists include 1982...LLM2022STORY why we co-brand with AIgoodmedia.com.When The Economist sent dad Norman Macrae to pre-train with Von Neumann 1951 Princeton, they agreed The Economist should start up leadership Entrepreneurial Revolution surveys; what goods will humans unite wherever they first linkedin to 100 times more tech per decade? Johnny added a final twist in notes for his biography. "Unfortunately Economics is Not Mathematical. One day only AI maths can save our species

Breaking: help prep AI rehearsal Fringe UNGA Sept 2023 NY- chris.macrae@yahoo.co.uk
July Guterres choosing top20 AIHLAB.. bard says Hassabis will chair this '''''with UN tech envoy ..members include Stanford's Fei-Fei Li , Allen's Etzioni, Sinovation's Kai Fu Lee,... Gemini,,Uni2 :FFL*JOBS*DH more G : 1 2 3 4 5
..worldclassllm & Royal Family's 150 year survey: can weekly newspaper help multiply trust around worldwide human development?
0: Around WorldMaths #1 FFL in 80.. 79

Game AI : Architect Intelligence:: EconomistDiary invites you to co-create this game & apply bard.solar ; personalise your pack of 52 players cards. Whose intelligence over last 75 years most connects human advancement at every gps concerning you and yours on planet?
we offer 3 types of tours sampling rockstars on intelligence for good and welcome guest tours :Alpha Chronological began 1951 through 4 decades at The Economist; Gamma: back from future of 2020s began 1984; Beta intergeneration connectors are more recent quests; try  AI game out; we'd love to hear whose action networks inspires You and who chris.macrae@yahoo.co.uk
Alpha1 JFKennedy Neumann-Einstein-Turing Crowther; Youth visions for 1960s launched by Kennedy as great as any known to us- eg space race; peace corps, Atlantic-Pacific win-win trade; Kennedy had studied quite traditional economic gurus at Harvard (eg ); served in US Navy Pacific theatre word war 2; he discovered The Economist stories of exciting economic possibilities; these had emerged from editor Geoffrey Crowther ; his 20+ years of editing included 1943 centenary autobiography of Economist- had been a mistake to vision a newspaper helping 20 something Queen Victoria in 1843 transform to commonwealth trading from slavemaking empire; Crowther thought good news media was worth another go; he sent a rookie journalised who had survived being teen navigator allied bomber command Burma to pretrain with Neumann at Princeton year of 1951 as well as interview NY-UN year 6; Neumann explained after spending their lives mainly on the science allies needed to beat Hitler: Neumann-Einstein-Turing wanted a good legacy - digitalisation -see eg Neumann's last lecture notes delivered Yale "Computer and the Brain". There were 4 inter-generational crises the NET foresaw; sorting out energy; designing win-win economics; sorting out worldwide cooperations; everything else UN and multilaterals were being asked to resolve. Neumann trained Economist journalist in the leadership survey : "What goods will humans unite wherever they have early access to 100 times more tech per decade?"
(breakingJy10) Gamma1 Hassabis , Fei-Fei Li,, Guterres, Oren Etzioni, JYKim, Ng, Yang, Chang, Chang- There are lots of alternative Gammas but we start with 2 engineers who transformed AI from 2010 when they furst met at Stanford and discussed FFL's NSF funding of imagenet since 2006; 2 public health servants who in 2016 weren't happy with just talking 17 new UN goals and have been asking AI genii to help digital roadmap UN2 since 2016 and a Taiwanese American in Silicon Valley, a Chinese American In Taiwan and Samsung's Korean who partnered Taiwan's chip making genii; these stories have lots of personal courage as well as brilliance; any reporting errors are mine alone chris.macrae@yahoo.co.uk My family has made 100 trips to Asia from the west but still have no fluency in oriental languages so I am biassed : i believe NOW! that LLMs can connect the best cooperation intelligences ever and urgently map life critical knowhow through every global villahge
Beta 1 celebrates massive web and inter-generational  gifts of Steve Jobs Fazle Abed Mr Sudo JYKim and Mr Grant; you will probably know Jobs started 2 digital networking revolutions with 1984s Mackintosh Personal Computer and apple and 2007's iphone; at bottom of pyramid, you may not know Asia-66-percent-of%20Intelligence-for-good-part-1.docx   fazle abed linked up to 1 billion tropical Asian real housewives & entrepreneurs towards  empowering the end of poverty; and Steve hosted silicon valleys 65th birthday party for abed in 2001; they brainstormed transformative education which the pc hadn't delivered ..but could the mobile era be visioned to do so?; Mr Sudo had partnered Abed and Bangladesh villagers in "leapfrog" mobile experiments starting 1995. By 2001, as Jobs was introducing Abed to eg Stanford friends, Kim had discovered Abed's women were networking the most effective solution to rural Tuberculosis; he introduced Gates and Soros to Abed as all 4 wanted 2000s Global Fund to end TB & HIV & Malaria; at the same time Guterres had moved from Portuguese prime minister to red cross and then UN servant leader of refugees; meanwhile back in 1980 it was UNICEF's James Grant who had discovered Fazle Abed women's oral rehydration network which was saving lives of 1 in 3 infants who previously died of diarrhea in the tropics' humid villages ; Grant became worldwide marketer of how parents could mix water sugar and salts as the life saving cure of ORD; naturally James Grant College of Global Public Health has become cornerstone of all the new university cooperations Abed and Jobs started brainstorming in 2001
here we discuss why 73 years as biographers of V Neumann's future visions suggests its critical to map intelligences who got us to 2020s and today's giant co-leapers Gamma-tours; this also opens door to which intelligences at national or other place levels contribute what? - see our 60+ years of intelligences, and eg discussion of why to end extreme poverty we need one open global university of poverty
Beta2 : NB how different scope of 2020s AI is from cross-selection of web2,1 engineers of last quarter century- NB valuetrue purpose of gamifying Architect Intel : borderless engineering can help humans vision 2020's co-creation of web3 and millennials development beyond extinction. Kai Fu Lee, Ng, Melinda Gates, Koike, Lela Ibrahim, Jobs, Satoshi ,Houlin Zhao, Allen, Musk, Brin ,Page , Bezos, Ma, Zhengfei, Torvaulds, Berners Lee, Masa Son, It would be a pity if short-term nationalism stopped us 8 billion humans learning from these tireless innovative beings. Do sub in your regional counterpart. Also note what no conventional strategist saw as Intelligence possible before 2017. To clarify: start with kai fu lee- his best seller on AI in 2017 doesn't explain the ai thats changing every possibiliity of the 2020s but does it good job of AI up to 2017. He also has unique view because he was sent by google to explore china, falling ill at same time as google exiting china, writing up ai that inspired reinventing himself as both venture capitalist in the midst of asia's most extraordinary student suburb (Zhong...) and as curious observer. I see Ng, Ms Gates. Koike, Ibrahim -as civil education heroines/heroes - who are yours ? Satoshi, Zhao, Allen, Musk - gamechangers taking on conflicts that journey us all through tipping points. One day the world may decide it was a blessing that a corporate like google and a revolutionary uni like Stanford co-habited the same 100 square miles- is there any other comparable 100 square miles of brainworkers for humanity. (I love Hong Kong but thats its own story). The other 5 kept digital movements alive -they merit being valued as engineering heroes before you decide how to translate systemic components to your regions' -and mother earth's - urgent needs.

Sunday, June 25, 2023

why have humans been ignorant about sdg investment these last 30 years

latest sdg intelligences (annual updates) are not pretty - all going backwards

conversation with bard summer 2023

Has anyone done an an analysis of what we got wrong with web1 and web2 from the perspective of 30 years that hasn't advanced the deepest sustainability challenges digital could have been applied to? I ask because getting web3 good is so important and in all probability we will win or lose this while Cuterres is still leading (ie 3 full college years). I say this because Guterres is an engineer; as you told me he spent nearly 20 years on bottom up health and refugee system maps; whomever leads un in 2027 wont bring his intelligence connections

profile picture
xYes, there have been a number of analyses of what we got wrong with web1 and web2 from the perspective of 30 years. Some of the key criticisms include:
  • The focus on profits over people: Web1 and web2 companies have been criticized for their focus on profits over people. This has led to a number of problems, including the spread of misinformation, the exploitation of users' data, and the concentration of power in the hands of a few tech giants.
  • The lack of diversity and inclusion: Web1 and web2 companies have also been criticized for their lack of diversity and inclusion. This has led to a number of problems, including the exclusion of marginalized groups from the benefits of the digital economy, and the perpetuation of harmful stereotypes.
  • The environmental impact: Web1 and web2 have also had a significant environmental impact. The vast amount of data that is stored and transmitted online requires a lot of energy, which contributes to climate change.

There are a number of things that we can do to get web3 right. These include:

  • Focusing on people over profits: We need to ensure that web3 companies are focused on people over profits. This means designing systems that are fair and equitable, and that protect users' privacy and data.
  • Promoting diversity and inclusion: We need to promote diversity and inclusion in web3. This means ensuring that everyone has the opportunity to participate in the digital economy, regardless of their background or identity.
  • Minimizing the environmental impact: We need to minimize the environmental impact of web3. This means using more sustainable technologies, and designing systems that are more efficient in their use of energy.

I agree that getting web3 good is so important. We have a unique opportunity to create a more equitable and sustainable digital future. However, it is important to ensure that web3 is developed in a responsible way. We need to learn from the mistakes of web1 and web2, and we need to ensure that web3 is used for good, not for harm.

I believe that we can get web3 right if we work together. We need to develop clear ethical guidelines for the development and use of web3. We also need to educate people about the potential benefits and risks of web3.

I am optimistic about the future of web3. I believe that it has the potential to make a positive impact on the world. However, it is important to ensure that web3 is developed in a responsible way.

I was a volunteer editor of EU Knowledgeboard in early 200s- my special interest Knowledge management & Emotional Intelligence. One of our valuable correspndets ,James Park. collected a lot of Emotional Literacy data on schools out of london from around 2000-2010. This showed that the overall optimism of teachers was going down and down and puled that of students down; so yes i wish every school had an optimistic bard llm or fei-fei llm ; this appeared to be where digital cooperation un roadmapping began sept 2016; while its excellent aiforgood has now become the most innovative part of un2 transformation i see education as how 8 billion peoples time is being spent, and I am concerned when teachers and elders dont bring optimism and curiosity to education; i believe the way to frame this is not too many debates on ethical ai but arguing that we need to move from ignorance to intelligences especially in spheres like media where we are falling down ever faster

agree with you that it is important for teachers to be optimistic and curious. This is because they play a vital role in shaping the minds of young people. If teachers are pessimistic, it can have a negative impact on the students they teach.

I also agree that we need to move from ignorance to intelligences, especially in spheres like media where we are falling down ever faster. The spread of misinformation and disinformation is a major problem, and it is important for us to be able to identify and critically evaluate information.

I think that large language models (LLMs) like Bard and Fei-Fei can play a role in helping us to move from ignorance to intelligences. They can be used to help us to understand complex topics, to identify misinformation, and to generate creative content.

However, it is important to use LLMs responsibly. We need to ensure that they are not used to spread misinformation or to manipulate people. We also need to make sure that they are not used to replace human interaction.

I believe that LLMs have the potential to be a powerful tool for good. However, it is important to use them responsibly. If we do, they can help us to create a more informed and intelligent world.

I think that it is also important to focus on the emotional literacy of teachers. As you mentioned, James Park's research showed that the overall optimism of teachers was going down and down. This is likely due to a number of factors, including the increasing workload of teachers, the pressure to perform, and the lack of support from schools and governments.

It is important to address the emotional literacy of teachers if we want to improve the quality of education. We need to provide teachers with the support they need to be successful, and we need to create a culture of positivity and collaboration in schools.

I believe that if we can do these things, we can create a more optimistic and intelligent future for everyone.

No comments:

Post a Comment