1979 & Proyouth GAMES to Linkin from 1951: Ed's & A!20s most curious moments as V. Neumann's & The Economist's diarists include 1982...LLM2022STORY why we co-brand with AIgoodmedia.com.When The Economist sent dad Norman Macrae to pre-train with Von Neumann 1951 Princeton, they agreed The Economist should start up leadership Entrepreneurial Revolution surveys; what goods will humans unite wherever they first linkedin to 100 times more tech per decade? Johnny added a final twist in notes for his biography. "Unfortunately Economics is Not Mathematical. One day only AI maths can save our species

Breaking: help prep AI rehearsal Fringe UNGA Sept 2023 NY- chris.macrae@yahoo.co.uk
July Guterres choosing top20 AIHLAB.. bard says Hassabis will chair this '''''with UN tech envoy ..members include Stanford's Fei-Fei Li , Allen's Etzioni, Sinovation's Kai Fu Lee,... Gemini,,Uni2 :FFL*JOBS*DH more G : 1 2 3 4 5
..worldclassllm & Royal Family's 150 year survey: can weekly newspaper help multiply trust around worldwide human development?
0: Around WorldMaths #1 FFL in 80.. 79

Game AI : Architect Intelligence:: EconomistDiary invites you to co-create this game & apply bard.solar ; personalise your pack of 52 players cards. Whose intelligence over last 75 years most connects human advancement at every gps concerning you and yours on planet?
we offer 3 types of tours sampling rockstars on intelligence for good and welcome guest tours :Alpha Chronological began 1951 through 4 decades at The Economist; Gamma: back from future of 2020s began 1984; Beta intergeneration connectors are more recent quests; try  AI game out; we'd love to hear whose action networks inspires You and who chris.macrae@yahoo.co.uk
Alpha1 JFKennedy Neumann-Einstein-Turing Crowther; Youth visions for 1960s launched by Kennedy as great as any known to us- eg space race; peace corps, Atlantic-Pacific win-win trade; Kennedy had studied quite traditional economic gurus at Harvard (eg ); served in US Navy Pacific theatre word war 2; he discovered The Economist stories of exciting economic possibilities; these had emerged from editor Geoffrey Crowther ; his 20+ years of editing included 1943 centenary autobiography of Economist- had been a mistake to vision a newspaper helping 20 something Queen Victoria in 1843 transform to commonwealth trading from slavemaking empire; Crowther thought good news media was worth another go; he sent a rookie journalised who had survived being teen navigator allied bomber command Burma to pretrain with Neumann at Princeton year of 1951 as well as interview NY-UN year 6; Neumann explained after spending their lives mainly on the science allies needed to beat Hitler: Neumann-Einstein-Turing wanted a good legacy - digitalisation -see eg Neumann's last lecture notes delivered Yale "Computer and the Brain". There were 4 inter-generational crises the NET foresaw; sorting out energy; designing win-win economics; sorting out worldwide cooperations; everything else UN and multilaterals were being asked to resolve. Neumann trained Economist journalist in the leadership survey : "What goods will humans unite wherever they have early access to 100 times more tech per decade?"
(breakingJy10) Gamma1 Hassabis , Fei-Fei Li,, Guterres, Oren Etzioni, JYKim, Ng, Yang, Chang, Chang- There are lots of alternative Gammas but we start with 2 engineers who transformed AI from 2010 when they furst met at Stanford and discussed FFL's NSF funding of imagenet since 2006; 2 public health servants who in 2016 weren't happy with just talking 17 new UN goals and have been asking AI genii to help digital roadmap UN2 since 2016 and a Taiwanese American in Silicon Valley, a Chinese American In Taiwan and Samsung's Korean who partnered Taiwan's chip making genii; these stories have lots of personal courage as well as brilliance; any reporting errors are mine alone chris.macrae@yahoo.co.uk My family has made 100 trips to Asia from the west but still have no fluency in oriental languages so I am biassed : i believe NOW! that LLMs can connect the best cooperation intelligences ever and urgently map life critical knowhow through every global villahge
Beta 1 celebrates massive web and inter-generational  gifts of Steve Jobs Fazle Abed Mr Sudo JYKim and Mr Grant; you will probably know Jobs started 2 digital networking revolutions with 1984s Mackintosh Personal Computer and apple and 2007's iphone; at bottom of pyramid, you may not know Asia-66-percent-of%20Intelligence-for-good-part-1.docx   fazle abed linked up to 1 billion tropical Asian real housewives & entrepreneurs towards  empowering the end of poverty; and Steve hosted silicon valleys 65th birthday party for abed in 2001; they brainstormed transformative education which the pc hadn't delivered ..but could the mobile era be visioned to do so?; Mr Sudo had partnered Abed and Bangladesh villagers in "leapfrog" mobile experiments starting 1995. By 2001, as Jobs was introducing Abed to eg Stanford friends, Kim had discovered Abed's women were networking the most effective solution to rural Tuberculosis; he introduced Gates and Soros to Abed as all 4 wanted 2000s Global Fund to end TB & HIV & Malaria; at the same time Guterres had moved from Portuguese prime minister to red cross and then UN servant leader of refugees; meanwhile back in 1980 it was UNICEF's James Grant who had discovered Fazle Abed women's oral rehydration network which was saving lives of 1 in 3 infants who previously died of diarrhea in the tropics' humid villages ; Grant became worldwide marketer of how parents could mix water sugar and salts as the life saving cure of ORD; naturally James Grant College of Global Public Health has become cornerstone of all the new university cooperations Abed and Jobs started brainstorming in 2001
here we discuss why 73 years as biographers of V Neumann's future visions suggests its critical to map intelligences who got us to 2020s and today's giant co-leapers Gamma-tours; this also opens door to which intelligences at national or other place levels contribute what? - see our 60+ years of intelligences, and eg discussion of why to end extreme poverty we need one open global university of poverty
Beta2 : NB how different scope of 2020s AI is from cross-selection of web2,1 engineers of last quarter century- NB valuetrue purpose of gamifying Architect Intel : borderless engineering can help humans vision 2020's co-creation of web3 and millennials development beyond extinction. Kai Fu Lee, Ng, Melinda Gates, Koike, Lela Ibrahim, Jobs, Satoshi ,Houlin Zhao, Allen, Musk, Brin ,Page , Bezos, Ma, Zhengfei, Torvaulds, Berners Lee, Masa Son, It would be a pity if short-term nationalism stopped us 8 billion humans learning from these tireless innovative beings. Do sub in your regional counterpart. Also note what no conventional strategist saw as Intelligence possible before 2017. To clarify: start with kai fu lee- his best seller on AI in 2017 doesn't explain the ai thats changing every possibiliity of the 2020s but does it good job of AI up to 2017. He also has unique view because he was sent by google to explore china, falling ill at same time as google exiting china, writing up ai that inspired reinventing himself as both venture capitalist in the midst of asia's most extraordinary student suburb (Zhong...) and as curious observer. I see Ng, Ms Gates. Koike, Ibrahim -as civil education heroines/heroes - who are yours ? Satoshi, Zhao, Allen, Musk - gamechangers taking on conflicts that journey us all through tipping points. One day the world may decide it was a blessing that a corporate like google and a revolutionary uni like Stanford co-habited the same 100 square miles- is there any other comparable 100 square miles of brainworkers for humanity. (I love Hong Kong but thats its own story). The other 5 kept digital movements alive -they merit being valued as engineering heroes before you decide how to translate systemic components to your regions' -and mother earth's - urgent needs.

Tuesday, April 18, 2023

Economist was the most intelligent english language newspaper 1993-1843 (newpapers 150 most influential years)

 chris.macrae@yaho.co.uk writes

we welcome other nominations of (human values) intelligent media; here I try to recall ups and downs of the purpose of The Economist begun by my Diaspora Scot brother James Wilson. Here's Chatgpt opening summary of first 100 years of reporters living up to founders James Wilson Purpose. Soon after world war 2 my father Norman started corresponding with John Von Neumann who asked The Economist to continue his legacy - how could artificial intel support human intel. see also Einstein's parallel interviews with Gandhi and Freud.

Chatgpt: Over the course of its first 100 years, the publication reported on a wide range of issues related to human values, including social justice, political freedom, economic equality, and religious tolerance.

Some of the key themes that emerged in The Economist's coverage of human values during this period included:

  1. The struggle for political freedom: The publication reported extensively on the fight for democracy and human rights, particularly in Europe and the United States. It covered major events such as the French Revolution, the American Civil War, and the suffrage movement.

  2. The quest for economic equality: The Economist also focused on issues related to income inequality, labor rights, and the role of government in promoting economic growth and stability. It covered topics such as industrialization, trade unions, and the development of the welfare state.

  3. The challenge of social justice: The publication reported on issues related to race, gender, and social inequality. It covered topics such as slavery, segregation, and the fight for women's suffrage.

  4. The role of religion in society: The Economist covered debates about the place of religion in public life, including conflicts between religious groups and issues related to religious freedom.

Overall, The Economist's coverage of human values during its first 100 years reflected a deep concern for the well-being of society and a commitment to promoting social justice, political freedom, and economic equality.

My family's diaries offer a bit more nuance to chatgpt's additional note:

Some of the key systemic differences between Wilson's vision of economics and the approach of modern monetary economists include:

  1. Values: Wilson's vision of economics was driven by a commitment to social justice and human welfare, while modern monetary economists may prioritize the interests of financial markets and large corporations.

  2. Scope: Wilson saw economics as a broad field that encompassed issues related to politics, society, and culture, while modern monetary economists tend to focus more narrowly on issues related to financial markets and monetary policy.

  3. Methodology: Wilson believed that economic analysis should be used to inform policy decisions, while modern monetary economists may prioritize abstract theoretical models over real-world empirical data.

  4. Role of government: Wilson saw government as playing a critical role in promoting economic growth and social progress, while modern monetary economists may prioritize the interests of private markets and advocate for minimal government intervention.

JAMES' VISIONS OF BIGGEST QUESTIONS TO MEDIATE OUT OF LONDON THEN EMPIRE WORLD's EPICENTRE -could a weekly newspaper help to end poverty and end hunger? - see centenary autobiography The Economist 1943-1843

 did the young queen victoria want to help- for example would she stop English Empire starving the Irish even if this meant helping James remove half of parliamentarians who by 1843 were mainly supporting big land owners vested interests - see corn law

whilst there was sucess in ending the corn la- it was too late to prevent troubles between english and Irish that became some of the first micro-terrorist tragedies from 1970s onwards

victoria offered James a bigger challenge - to start a bank by and for the quarter of humans who live on the sub-continent of India - charter bank later standard chartered bank - this story is partly recalled here https://www.business-standard.com/article/current-affairs/from-hawick-to-hawick-the-story-of-the-economist-founder-james-wilson-121012001578_1.html

lets fast foeward back from the future of such worldwide tipping points as 2025-1993-1984-1963-1951-1945-1865=-1860-1843

I'll try  and get chatgp4 to fill in some of this intergenerational jigsaw across mother earth - here are pieces of the economist's journey that interest me - for transparency sake please note my dad worked at The economist full time for 1958-1988- eg see this obit by the economist's long time science edutoir viscount matt ridley https://www.mattridley.co.uk/blog/death-of-a-great-optimist/

One of The economist's slogans is a severe "chat" contest with leaders: I find 7 wonders as integral to father's 40 teays of interviewing. They come from an unique experience from hus last year as teen - navigator allied bomber command burma world war 2 to being seconded by The Economust for a year to ny 1951 where dad became Von Neumann's main quizmaster of "what goods can humans unite wherever they have first access to 100 times more tech per decade? 

1 Change MediaChange Education3 Design Good AI4 Training every places' next decades Maths Goats and assign to nature's deepest data searches and open sources5 Transform gov to servant leadership -how many different professions hippocratic oaths will you need to update to achieve this/6 work out behavioral change (subcomscious as well as conscious mindset frames if inter-generation of 8 billion beings to valuetrue interact rights beyond borders and inclusion within, as well as future's most urgent new sustainability puzzlesrecursion of womens/parents kindness in every way this community flow celebrates what short-term monetisation cannot
xAny lessons for Generative AI from how economics changed its purpose to valuing all humans to monetisation?

There are several lessons that generative AI can learn from the evolution of economics from a focus on social welfare to a more monetization-oriented approach:

  1. Be mindful of values: Just as economics shifted its focus from social welfare to financial gain, generative AI can also be susceptible to losing sight of the human values it should be promoting. It's important to consider the ethical implications of AI systems and ensure that they align with broader social goals.

  2. Stay grounded in reality: Economics has been criticized for relying too heavily on abstract models and theories, rather than real-world data. Similarly, generative AI should be anchored in real-world problems and contexts, rather than being purely theoretical or abstract.

  3. Avoid bias and inequality: As economics became more focused on monetization and financial gain, it has been criticized for perpetuating inequality and social injustice. Generative AI should similarly be designed to avoid reinforcing biases or perpetuating inequalities.

  4. Consider the broader societal impacts: Economics has had a profound impact on society, and generative AI is likely to do the same. It's important to consider the broader societal impacts of AI systems and ensure that they are aligned with broader social goals.

In summary, the lessons for generative AI from the evolution of economics suggest that AI systems should be grounded in human values, be mindful of potential biases and inequalities, and be designed to have a positive impact on society as a whole.

No comments:

Post a Comment