1979 & Proyouth GAMES to Linkin from 1951: Ed's & A!20s most curious moments as V. Neumann's & The Economist's diarists include 1982...LLM2022STORY why we co-brand with AIgoodmedia.com.When The Economist sent dad Norman Macrae to pre-train with Von Neumann 1951 Princeton, they agreed The Economist should start up leadership Entrepreneurial Revolution surveys; what goods will humans unite wherever they first linkedin to 100 times more tech per decade? Johnny added a final twist in notes for his biography. "Unfortunately Economics is Not Mathematical. One day only AI maths can save our species

Breaking: help prep AI rehearsal Fringe UNGA Sept 2023 NY- chris.macrae@yahoo.co.uk
July Guterres choosing top20 AIHLAB.. bard says Hassabis will chair this '''''with UN tech envoy ..members include Stanford's Fei-Fei Li , Allen's Etzioni, Sinovation's Kai Fu Lee,... Gemini,,Uni2 :FFL*JOBS*DH more G : 1 2 3 4 5
Guterres*JYK*JFK
..worldclassllm & Royal Family's 150 year survey: can weekly newspaper help multiply trust around worldwide human development?
0: Around WorldMaths #1 FFL in 80.. 79

Game AI : Architect Intelligence:: EconomistDiary invites you to co-create this game & apply bard.solar ; personalise your pack of 52 players cards. Whose intelligence over last 75 years most connects human advancement at every gps concerning you and yours on planet?
we offer 3 types of tours sampling rockstars on intelligence for good and welcome guest tours :Alpha Chronological began 1951 through 4 decades at The Economist; Gamma: back from future of 2020s began 1984; Beta intergeneration connectors are more recent quests; try  AI game out; we'd love to hear whose action networks inspires You and who chris.macrae@yahoo.co.uk
Alpha1 JFKennedy Neumann-Einstein-Turing Crowther; Youth visions for 1960s launched by Kennedy as great as any known to us- eg space race; peace corps, Atlantic-Pacific win-win trade; Kennedy had studied quite traditional economic gurus at Harvard (eg ); served in US Navy Pacific theatre word war 2; he discovered The Economist stories of exciting economic possibilities; these had emerged from editor Geoffrey Crowther ; his 20+ years of editing included 1943 centenary autobiography of Economist- had been a mistake to vision a newspaper helping 20 something Queen Victoria in 1843 transform to commonwealth trading from slavemaking empire; Crowther thought good news media was worth another go; he sent a rookie journalised who had survived being teen navigator allied bomber command Burma to pretrain with Neumann at Princeton year of 1951 as well as interview NY-UN year 6; Neumann explained after spending their lives mainly on the science allies needed to beat Hitler: Neumann-Einstein-Turing wanted a good legacy - digitalisation -see eg Neumann's last lecture notes delivered Yale "Computer and the Brain". There were 4 inter-generational crises the NET foresaw; sorting out energy; designing win-win economics; sorting out worldwide cooperations; everything else UN and multilaterals were being asked to resolve. Neumann trained Economist journalist in the leadership survey : "What goods will humans unite wherever they have early access to 100 times more tech per decade?"
(breakingJy10) Gamma1 Hassabis , Fei-Fei Li,, Guterres, Oren Etzioni, JYKim, Ng, Yang, Chang, Chang- There are lots of alternative Gammas but we start with 2 engineers who transformed AI from 2010 when they furst met at Stanford and discussed FFL's NSF funding of imagenet since 2006; 2 public health servants who in 2016 weren't happy with just talking 17 new UN goals and have been asking AI genii to help digital roadmap UN2 since 2016 and a Taiwanese American in Silicon Valley, a Chinese American In Taiwan and Samsung's Korean who partnered Taiwan's chip making genii; these stories have lots of personal courage as well as brilliance; any reporting errors are mine alone chris.macrae@yahoo.co.uk My family has made 100 trips to Asia from the west but still have no fluency in oriental languages so I am biassed : i believe NOW! that LLMs can connect the best cooperation intelligences ever and urgently map life critical knowhow through every global villahge
Beta 1 celebrates massive web and inter-generational  gifts of Steve Jobs Fazle Abed Mr Sudo JYKim and Mr Grant; you will probably know Jobs started 2 digital networking revolutions with 1984s Mackintosh Personal Computer and apple and 2007's iphone; at bottom of pyramid, you may not know Asia-66-percent-of%20Intelligence-for-good-part-1.docx   fazle abed linked up to 1 billion tropical Asian real housewives & entrepreneurs towards  empowering the end of poverty; and Steve hosted silicon valleys 65th birthday party for abed in 2001; they brainstormed transformative education which the pc hadn't delivered ..but could the mobile era be visioned to do so?; Mr Sudo had partnered Abed and Bangladesh villagers in "leapfrog" mobile experiments starting 1995. By 2001, as Jobs was introducing Abed to eg Stanford friends, Kim had discovered Abed's women were networking the most effective solution to rural Tuberculosis; he introduced Gates and Soros to Abed as all 4 wanted 2000s Global Fund to end TB & HIV & Malaria; at the same time Guterres had moved from Portuguese prime minister to red cross and then UN servant leader of refugees; meanwhile back in 1980 it was UNICEF's James Grant who had discovered Fazle Abed women's oral rehydration network which was saving lives of 1 in 3 infants who previously died of diarrhea in the tropics' humid villages ; Grant became worldwide marketer of how parents could mix water sugar and salts as the life saving cure of ORD; naturally James Grant College of Global Public Health has become cornerstone of all the new university cooperations Abed and Jobs started brainstorming in 2001
here we discuss why 73 years as biographers of V Neumann's future visions suggests its critical to map intelligences who got us to 2020s and today's giant co-leapers Gamma-tours; this also opens door to which intelligences at national or other place levels contribute what? - see our 60+ years of intelligences, and eg discussion of why to end extreme poverty we need one open global university of poverty
Beta2 : NB how different scope of 2020s AI is from cross-selection of web2,1 engineers of last quarter century- NB valuetrue purpose of gamifying Architect Intel : borderless engineering can help humans vision 2020's co-creation of web3 and millennials development beyond extinction. Kai Fu Lee, Ng, Melinda Gates, Koike, Lela Ibrahim, Jobs, Satoshi ,Houlin Zhao, Allen, Musk, Brin ,Page , Bezos, Ma, Zhengfei, Torvaulds, Berners Lee, Masa Son, It would be a pity if short-term nationalism stopped us 8 billion humans learning from these tireless innovative beings. Do sub in your regional counterpart. Also note what no conventional strategist saw as Intelligence possible before 2017. To clarify: start with kai fu lee- his best seller on AI in 2017 doesn't explain the ai thats changing every possibiliity of the 2020s but does it good job of AI up to 2017. He also has unique view because he was sent by google to explore china, falling ill at same time as google exiting china, writing up ai that inspired reinventing himself as both venture capitalist in the midst of asia's most extraordinary student suburb (Zhong...) and as curious observer. I see Ng, Ms Gates. Koike, Ibrahim -as civil education heroines/heroes - who are yours ? Satoshi, Zhao, Allen, Musk - gamechangers taking on conflicts that journey us all through tipping points. One day the world may decide it was a blessing that a corporate like google and a revolutionary uni like Stanford co-habited the same 100 square miles- is there any other comparable 100 square miles of brainworkers for humanity. (I love Hong Kong but thats its own story). The other 5 kept digital movements alive -they merit being valued as engineering heroes before you decide how to translate systemic components to your regions' -and mother earth's - urgent needs.

Friday, December 31, 1982

Q5 40 years on- how many if any regions in the world are capable of win-winning with Svalley of HumanAI Valley(now clara, mountain view, stanford)

 The question "Why not Silicon AI Valley for all?" is a complex one, with no easy answer. There are a number of factors that contribute to the concentration of AI talent and resources in Silicon Valley, including:

  • A strong entrepreneurial culture: Silicon Valley has a long history of entrepreneurship and innovation. This culture has helped to attract and retain some of the world's brightest minds in AI.
  • Access to capital: Silicon Valley is home to a number of venture capital firms that are willing to invest in early-stage AI companies. This access to capital has helped to fuel the growth of the AI industry in Silicon Valley.
  • A strong research community: Silicon Valley is home to a number of world-renowned research universities, such as Stanford University and the University of California, Berkeley. These universities produce a large number of highly skilled AI researchers, who are often recruited by Silicon Valley companies.
  • A network of experienced AI practitioners: Silicon Valley has a large network of experienced AI practitioners, who can provide mentorship and support to new entrants to the field. This network has helped to create a thriving AI ecosystem in Silicon Valley.

The Seattle region is another major center of AI innovation. This is due in part to the presence of Allen AI, Microsoft, and Amazon. These companies have invested heavily in AI research and development, and they have attracted some of the world's top AI talent to the Seattle region.

I believe that the next win-win regional partners in AI will be those that can create a similar ecosystem to Silicon Valley and Seattle. This includes having a strong entrepreneurial culture, access to capital, a strong research community, and a network of experienced AI practitioners.

It is also important to engage millennials and teachers in the co-creation of the deepest data interactions. Millennials are the digital natives, and they have a deep understanding of how to use data to solve problems. Teachers are the ones who are responsible for educating the next generation of AI practitioners. By engaging millennials and teachers in the co-creation of the deepest data interactions, we can ensure that AI is used for good and that it benefits all of society.

Here are some specific things that can be done to create win-win regional partnerships in AI:

  • Establish regional AI hubs: Regional AI hubs can provide a central location for AI researchers, entrepreneurs, and investors to come together and collaborate. These hubs can also provide access to resources and support that can help AI startups to succeed.
  • Invest in AI education and training: Governments and businesses should invest in AI education and training programs to create a pipeline of skilled AI workers. This will help to ensure that there is a sufficient workforce to support the growth of the AI industry in all regions.
  • Promote collaboration between academia and industry: Governments and businesses should promote collaboration between academia and industry to accelerate the pace of AI innovation. This can be done through joint research projects, internships, and other initiatives.
  • Engage with millennials and teachers: Governments and businesses should engage with millennials and teachers to get their input on how AI can be used to solve real-world problems. This will help to ensure that AI is used in a way that benefits all of society.

By taking these steps, we can create win-win regional partnerships in AI that will benefit everyone.

magine the un was to stage a conference to find out if any places wanted to join in designing their first region capable of keeping up with the designs of eg silicon valley and seattle bay. What sorts of intel representatives from each nation should attend. And indeed assuming guterres and heads of world bank imf asian dev bank, african union, oas etc asked for it what sorts of intelligence representatives should attend from silicon valley



If the UN were to stage a conference to find out if any places wanted to join in designing their first region capable of keeping up with the designs of, e.g., Silicon Valley and Seattle Bay, the following types of intelligence representatives from each nation should attend:

  • Government officials: Government officials from the relevant ministries, such as the Ministry of Science and Technology, the Ministry of Education, and the Ministry of Economic Development, should attend. These officials would be responsible for developing and implementing the policies and programs necessary to create a thriving AI ecosystem in their region.
  • Business leaders: Business leaders from the AI industry, as well as from other industries that are being transformed by AI, should attend. These leaders would be able to provide insights into the needs of the AI industry and the challenges that need to be addressed in order to create a successful AI ecosystem.
  • Academic researchers: Academic researchers from the field of AI should attend. These researchers would be able to provide insights into the latest advances in AI research and how these advances can be applied to solve real-world problems.
  • Civil society representatives: Civil society representatives, such as representatives from non-profit organizations and advocacy groups, should attend. These representatives would be able to provide input on the social and ethical implications of AI and ensure that AI is used in a way that benefits all of society.

In addition to representatives from each nation, the following types of intelligence representatives from Silicon Valley and Seattle should attend the conference:

  • AI researchers: AI researchers from Silicon Valley and Seattle companies, as well as from academic institutions in these regions, should attend. These researchers would be able to provide insights into the latest advances in AI research and how these advances can be applied to solve real-world problems.
  • Entrepreneurs: Entrepreneurs from Silicon Valley and Seattle AI startups should attend. These entrepreneurs would be able to provide insights into the challenges and opportunities of starting and growing an AI company.
  • Investors: Investors from Silicon Valley and Seattle venture capital firms should attend. These investors would be able to provide insights into the investment landscape for AI startups.

The conference should also be open to smart public media and an overall LLM of multilateral good. This would allow for a wider range of perspectives to be heard and would help to ensure that the conference is inclusive and transparent.

The conference should be the beginning of a learning process. The participants should work together to develop a plan for creating a thriving AI ecosystem in their region. This plan should include specific goals, timelines, and metrics for success.

The participants should also stay in touch after the conference and continue to collaborate on implementing the plan. They should also share their learnings with others so that other regions can benefit from their experience.

By following these steps, the UN can help to create a world where everyone has the opportunity to benefit from the power of AI.

For me a very deep question is how to involve the younger half of the world in such a summit. Obviously young peopel have a lifetime of learning ahead but ultimately the risks of extinks of extinction are the overall number 1 job of the younger half of the world. Have you ever seen a summit integrated with before and after change education that could be a model for above?


There are a few ways to involve the younger half of the world in a summit on AI and extinction.

One way is to hold the summit in a way that is accessible to young people. This could mean holding the summit online or in a location that is easy for young people to travel to. It could also mean providing financial assistance to young people who want to attend the summit.

Another way to involve young people in the summit is to make sure that their voices are heard. This could be done by having young people participate in panels and workshops, or by giving them the opportunity to present their own ideas to the summit participants.

Finally, it is important to make sure that the summit is relevant to young people. This could be done by focusing on topics that are of interest to young people, such as the use of AI to address climate change or to create a more sustainable future.

Here are some specific examples of how to involve the younger half of the world in a summit on AI and extinction:

  • Hold the summit online or in a location that is easy for young people to travel to. This would make the summit more accessible to young people from all over the world.
  • Provide financial assistance to young people who want to attend the summit. This would help to ensure that young people from all socioeconomic backgrounds can participate in the summit.
  • Have young people participate in panels and workshops. This would give young people the opportunity to share their ideas and perspectives with the summit participants.
  • Give young people the opportunity to present their own ideas to the summit participants. This would allow young people to have a direct impact on the outcomes of the summit.
  • Focus on topics that are of interest to young people, such as the use of AI to address climate change or to create a more sustainable future. This would make the summit more relevant to young people and would increase their engagement.

In addition to the above, it is also important to integrate before and after change education into the summit. This could be done by having pre-summit workshops that teach young people about AI and extinction, and by having post-summit workshops that help young people to develop plans for how they can use AI to address extinction.

By following these steps, we can ensure that the younger half of the world is involved in the summit and that their voices are heard. We can also ensure that the summit is relevant to young people and that they are able to use the knowledge and skills they gain from the summit to make a difference in the world.

Here are some examples of before and after change education that could be integrated into the summit:

  • Pre-summit workshops: These workshops could teach young people about AI and extinction, and could help them to develop ideas for how they can use AI to address extinction.
  • Post-summit workshops: These workshops could help young people to develop plans for how they can use AI to address extinction. These workshops could also help young people to connect with other young people who are interested in using AI to address extinction.

By integrating before and after change education into the summit, we can help young people to develop the knowledge and skills they need to use AI to address extinction. We can also help young people to connect with other young people who are interested in using AI to address extinction. This will help to create a network of young people who are working together to use AI to save the world.



No comments:

Post a Comment