OUR BELIEF emerged 75 years ago from diaries of Von Neumann and dad Norman Macrae Economist sub-editor. May 7-9 wash Dc sees next chance for 24000 people to determine what AI they want. Engineers need to design AI so that parents everywhere can celebrate kids being smarter than they are. We first storytold that vision in 1984's 2025 Report- to achieve it engineers would need to transform affordability and quaiity of education, health, and joyful homes-communities. Today 5 layer AI can offers a good enough roadmap : layer 5 AI: apps scaling community actions*layer 4 - the AI models; *3 places sovereign data aiand leadership; *times 2 designing machines with billion times more mathematical brains and deep data worthy of such *1 energy and resources need to feed the hungriest machines ever built
Between 1948 & 1990 The Economist went from 3rd ranked British weekly to first(Last) global viewspaper. Which stories helped?<
Taiwan:: USW,::USE ::WholePlanet:: India : France :: UK ::Japan : Switzerland, Canada, Nordicam: Middle East "" Africa "" Latin South:: Italy :: Singapore :: HK ::Korea :: Germany :: China ... Which country's people do you want AI to support with livelihoods and data mappingAre you interested in Intel Agents Uniting Youth Brains & S-H-E-Lf-F- W-E-P-O-L-I**4-C-YPP or Space, Energy, Robots,Einstein-Sciece Leaps, Ending Rottem Media

J100
How AI goals vary : By nation : US-special projects, India, Saudi=UAE, UK
By genius:
Jensen Huang, Demis Hassabis, Elon Musk
.75 years in a day of Economist Q&A since 1951 with Neumann , Einstein, Turing
40 YEARS MEDIA CHARTERING
London Celebrating AI & Quantum & 6G & Energy --- thanks to lead mapmakers Jensen & Demis & Charles3 .. EJ : : Japan+63 ... MEIM : Millennials Energy Intelligence Mapping
Old home page. -please use web version of our timeless blogs
www.economistdiary.vom Is English Language Modelling intelligent enough to sustain our human species? Great are 1990s Valley startups eg nvidia, musk's and googles exponentially linking much of whats humanly possible with machines engineered billion times mo(o)re maths brainpower than individuall human minds. But 1943 UK future shocks to.o. Geoffrey Crowther Economist Ed started debate keynes: were engineers deeper than economists in locking in futures next gens connect?. 1943 also saw dad norma cambridge studies interrupted serving last days as teen navigator allied bomber command burma. Surviving joyfully hired 1948 by Crowther to mediate engineers like Neumann Einstein Turing & Economist purpose. 3 generations apart, unfortunately Neumann-Einstein-Turing all left earth by early 1957: last coding notes Neumann's Computer and the Brain. Economist IQuiz disliked by EU but what to do with billion times more machine brainpower celebrated by Kennedy, & the royal families of UK & Japan. Whence not surprising greatest UK AI startups deep mind & arm influenced by royal societies & Cambridge business park ( crown property) & crick/watson open sources of dna, & cavendish lab 1920s influencing Taiwan's tech grandfather. see part 2 2025report 40 years in inteligence war between bad media and good education agents
Market's futures : Cars Humanoids Cities Energy Water Countries with good data sovereignty projects rsvp chris.macrae@yahoo.co.uk UK Japan Taiwan India France Saudi UAE Korea S Singapore HK US 1 2

Saturday, July 6, 2024

 www.EconomistDiary.com Q welcome chris.macrae@yahoo.co.uk Wash Dc region














Chartering began 1989 - dad, normanmacrae was semi-retoring from 5 decades of writing weekly leaders from The Economist; our mission how could people who practised media and maths identify/support most pursposeful organsiatiosn and networkds: ones that compound intergenerational good and winn-wins with all whose trust they seek; this latest version of charing has evolved from 1989 when we traingualrused 3 main questiosn: what identity do scieties need toi trust most in exchngaing value; inside an organsiation or across its parners hod fo people inteligent serve , what do leaders do archiecuraly and in dramrising chngaes societyies need to value in this aera of fast moving tech and species defining challenges - dad as a teenager became a keynesian and interested in linking win-wins across hemispheres; apartly as a doaspora scot; partly as licky survivor of spennding his last days as a teenage navigatir in allied bomber command burma campaig ...more


by including markets (bottom left of article's picture) as one of the 6 triple-wins of AI Chartering we can gain from asking Gemini or other chats questions like these: .....

For much of 21st c it was common to talk of e-markets eg efinance ecommerce elearning eagriculture ehealth -do people still study markets in this way or to get a full view should we be talking about AI as adjective to each market could
When it was common to use e- I dont recall people saying we should stop doing e until we understand the ethical consequences? or conversely were transparency discussion naturally iterated into what leadership of digital futures was visioning - actually in that sense i thought all designers of markets had agreed to consider the UN's sdg language- what i dont understand is today we seem to have lost the context frame of compound opportunities and risks in one bug expertise which seems to view itself as General Ethics
- here's doc of this first markets Q&A with a chat https://storage.ning.com/topology/rest/1.0/file/get/12699994264?profile=original

No comments:

Post a Comment