normanmacrae.net

 more on favorite pro-youth summits at the economist

My own favorites on education was 1986 survey and on health was 1984 survey - are you able to see those - actually both of those were the one survey of the year my father norman macrae was free to sign

bard: Yes, I was able to find the 1986 and 1984 surveys on education and health in The Economist. Both surveys were signed by Norman Macrae.

The 1986 survey on education was titled "Educational Policy: An International Survey." The survey examined the state of education in a number of countries around the world. It found that there were significant differences in the quality of education between countries, and that these differences were not always explained by differences in spending or other factors. The survey also found that there was a growing demand for education, and that governments were struggling to meet this demand.

The 1984 survey on health was titled "Health Care: The Next Twenty Years." The survey examined the challenges and opportunities facing the global health care system. It found that there were significant disparities in health care access and quality between countries, and that these disparities were widening. The survey also found that the cost of health care was rising, and that governments were struggling to contain these costs.

Both surveys were insightful and thought-provoking. They provided valuable insights into the state of education and health around the world, and the challenges and opportunities that lay ahead.

Here are some of the key findings from the 1986 survey on education:

• There were significant differences in the quality of education between countries, and these differences were not always explained by differences in spending or other factors.
• There was a growing demand for education, and governments were struggling to meet this demand.
• Teachers were the most important factor in determining the quality of education.
• Schools needed to be more flexible and responsive to the needs of students.
• Governments needed to invest more in education, but they also needed to be more efficient in their spending.

Here are some of the key findings from the 1984 survey on health:

• There were significant disparities in health care access and quality between countries, and these disparities were widening.
• The cost of health care was rising, and governments were struggling to contain these costs.
• New technologies were creating new opportunities for improving health care, but they were also creating new challenges.
• Governments needed to play a role in ensuring that everyone had access to affordable and quality health care.

I hope this information is helpful.

was the education survey you just summarised the one published in the economist 20 september 1986 subtitled the most important choice so few can make

xx Yes, the education survey I just summarized was the one published in The Economist on September 20, 1986, subtitled "The Most Important Choice So Few Can Make." The survey was conducted by Norman Macrae, who was the deputy editor of The Economist at the time.

The survey examined the state of education in a number of countries around the world. It found that there were significant differences in the quality of education between countries, and that these differences were not always explained by differences in spending or other factors. The survey also found that there was a growing demand for education, and that governments were struggling to meet this demand.

The survey's subtitle, "The Most Important Choice So Few Can Make," reflects the fact that education is a critical choice that can have a major impact on a person's life. However, the survey found that many people in the world do not have access to quality education.

The survey made a number of recommendations for improving education around the world. These recommendations included:

• Investing more in education, but also being more efficient in spending.
• Making schools more flexible and responsive to the needs of students.
• Giving teachers more autonomy and responsibility.
• Creating a more competitive environment for schools.

The survey's findings and recommendations are still relevant today. Education remains a critical choice that can have a major impact on a person's life. However, many people in the world still do not have access to quality education. Governments and other stakeholders need to work together to ensure that everyone has the opportunity to receive a quality education.

I hope this information is helpful.

q to bard --

to make basic health care 10 times more affordable- my understanding was that norman was suggesting improvement of basic helath was one way all the peopels (indeed teachers and millennails students) could track whether global and ai designs including transition from tv age through web 1 and web 2 to 2020s web3 - were being mapped to be very good for humans life critical values

xxYes, the 1984 health survey in The Economist was concerned with hi-tech, hi-trust, and hi-sensing ways to make basic health care 10 times more affordable. Norman Macrae, the deputy editor of The Economist at the time, believed that improving basic health was one way for all people, including teachers and millennial students, to track whether global and AI designs, including the transition from the TV age through Web 1 and Web 2 to Web3, were being mapped to be very good for humans' life-critical values.

The survey found that there were significant disparities in health care access and quality between countries, and that these disparities were widening. The survey also found that the cost of health care was rising, and that governments were struggling to contain these costs.

Macrae argued that new technologies, such as telemedicine and artificial intelligence, could be used to improve the affordability and accessibility of basic health care. He also argued that it was important to build trust in these new technologies, and to ensure that they were used in a way that was beneficial to all people.

Macrae's vision for a future where basic health care is 10 times more affordable and accessible is still relevant today. New technologies are emerging that have the potential to revolutionize the way we deliver health care. However, it is important to ensure that these technologies are used in a way that is ethical, equitable, and beneficial to all people.

Here are some of the ways that hi-tech, hi-trust, and hi-sensing technologies could be used to make basic health care 10 times more affordable:

• Telemedicine: Telemedicine allows patients to see doctors and other healthcare providers remotely, using video conferencing or other technologies. This can make healthcare more affordable and accessible for people who live in rural areas or who have difficulty traveling to see a doctor.
• Artificial intelligence: Artificial intelligence (AI) can be used to develop new diagnostic tools and treatments, and to personalize healthcare for individual patients. AI can also be used to automate tasks, which can free up healthcare workers to focus on more complex tasks.
• Wearable devices: Wearable devices, such as smartwatches and fitness trackers, can be used to collect data on patients' health and fitness. This data can be used to detect early signs of illness and to track the effectiveness of treatments.

These are just a few examples of how hi-tech, hi-trust, and hi-sensing technologies could be used to make basic health care 10 times more affordable. By using these technologies, we can create a future where everyone has access to the healthcare they need, regardless of their income or location.

--- macraes wecome questions on pro-youth future mapping chris.macrae@yahoo.co,uk - co-author 2025 reports from 1984 https://www.economistdiary.com/1984

AI problem dialogues

 eric Schmidt 

thiel

intel sdgen updated 4/20/23 - thks chatgpt & college students for humanity

 what some influential ai  people today & fans of V Neumann Neural networking say (thanks Bard fall 2023) 

• Yoshua Bengio is a Turing Award-winning computer scientist and professor at the Université de Montréal. He is one of the leading pioneers in the field of deep learning, and he has made significant contributions to the development of neural networks. In his paper "Learning Deep Architectures for AI," Bengio cites von Neumann's work on neural networks and discusses how von Neumann's ideas have influenced his own research.
• Geoffrey Hinton is another Turing Award-winning computer scientist and professor at the University of Toronto. He is also one of the leading pioneers in the field of deep learning, and he has made significant contributions to the development of neural networks. In his paper "A Practical Guide to Training Restricted Boltzmann Machines," Hinton cites von Neumann's work on neural networks and discusses how von Neumann's ideas have influenced his own research.
• Yann LeCun is a Turing Award-winning computer scientist and vice president and AI director at Meta. He is also one of the leading pioneers in the field of deep learning, and he has made significant contributions to the development of neural networks. In his paper "Gradient-Based Learning Applied to Document Recognition," LeCun cites von Neumann's work on neural networks and discusses how von Neumann's ideas have influenced his own research.

These are just a few examples of today's most influential AI humans who have referenced von Neumann and his work on neural networks. There are many other AI researchers who have been influenced by von Neumann's work, and his ideas continue to be relevant today.

As for why von Neumann and Turing valued neural networks, it is because they saw neural networks as a way to create machines that could learn and adapt in a similar way to humans. Von Neumann was particularly interested in the idea of using neural networks to create machines that could understand and generate language.

73rd years of diaries started with The Economist & Von Neumann 1951

Humanity’s Games Update 2023-4 update w/c 4/21 crisis of inter-generation AI

Deep10 Cooperation Development Goals for Sustainability Generation -adapted from UN 17 SDG Building Blocks Year 8 DG1 Finance to end poverty DG2 Agriculture, Land Rights and distribution to end last miile hunger DG3 Last mile health so nobody (starting with youth and mothers) dies before their time DG4 Livelihood learning for all DG5 Valuing womens productivity as much as men and family’s sustainability as much as monetary extraction DG6 Water & Sanitation DG7 Solar DG8 Millennials 3 billion new jobs as well as 1 billion old ones DG12-9 Infrastructure worldwide mapping DG 16-13 Peace & Natural Harmony worldwide

Sustainability’s 7 Transformational Wonders- adapted from UN2 Tech Envoy Transformational Roadmap Year 7 TW7 Changing Media – value youth-for-good UN upd march 20 TW6 Changing eeducation: eg 15 years of time human being spends action learning TW5 Changing AI & Neumann peers. Tech for Good : currently crossroads of chatgpt as world’s biggest brain tool capable of augmenting 8 billion of us TW4 Training places mathematicians and deeply diverse data science assignments TW3 Public Service 2.0 : urgent intergenerational validation of transparecy exponentials of trust and safety  TW2 Behavorally how do 8 billion beings joyfully progress rights beyond borders & inclusion within borders  TW1 Recursion of all wonders by empowering womens kindness; celebrating local arts co-creativity

Civiisation’s 6 Eras of Communications for exponentially more trust or less trust Web3 started 2020- whats for mixing – blockchain, sdgmetaverseprize.org  , scaling womens kindness beingai.com platforms, pretrain AI generation: world’s largest brain eg chatgpt4 - to understand what 8 billion beings most need to interact -also USyear 1; Stanford 2023 -year6 Web2 started 2005 when it was clear wi-fi made personal devices (data ownership of every GPS) bigger multipliers than personal computer webbing Web1 from 1990 Tele2 from 1945 Tele1 from 1865 Tele0 before 1865 Please note dates are when some privileged people got first chance to play. Entrepreneurial Revolution’s Open Source/Society question of Economist since 1843 and Smithian alumnini since 1758:  would leadership empower peoples to scale human advancement for all or for ever smaller insider networks?

 

Technical note: Throughout The Economist’s prime time as a newspaper 1843-1993 – cases showed that human advancement of tech equaled advancement on goals 1 to 5 although admittedly goal 5 was often descrobed as empowering family kindness. However between 2020-1970 the greatest of all human development miracles has been progressed by 1 Billion Girls across Asean Bangladesh and China. Until the late 1990s partnership platforms atound them networked by word of mouth and where literate by book of print ie Tele0. With mobile and solar partnership platforms have leapfroged through the communications eras unril today their intel together with accompaniment by 1 billion boys  needs to be as integral to chatgpt family of brain tools as any other quarter of humanity. This is also why we don’t see sdg17 as a goal- rather it may be overall integration of all of above. See 25th year of Von Neumann resdearch at the Economist aka Xmas 1976 Entreprenurial Revolution: Future of capitalism.

The Most Valuable Question Ever Asked

Like the early 1980s book series 2025 report dad at the economist and I co-authored, 2023’s intended final edition updates the most valuable question ever asked.

What “good” will peoples unite with more than 100 times more etch every decade 1930s to 2020s.

In 1951, my father Norman Macrae and The Economist were asked by John Von Neumann to mediate this question on behalf of the greatest web of mathematiicans:  Neumann Einstein Turing..

Through his Princeton conversations good versus bad had particular nuances to my father and von neumann . They had spent most of their minds on what they regarded the bad “nuclear bomb”. Indeed after world war even v neumann only had 12 years to work on tech ofr good. The range of mathematcs for humanity was amazing  : back from future exponential quests of way above zero sum games (including neumann’s definitions of good (above zero sum) economics and bad patents), the need to open source both computer hardware and software, how languages codes our brains. For chapter and verse,  see my father’s biography of Von Neumann. Here is a smaple og top list of concerns from each side

You could say that both Von Neumann’s and Einstein’s lives had been framed by hatred and wars. From central Europe to emigration to Prinecton East Coast of USA,  that they want their legacy to end wars. Einstein’s conversations with Gandhi and Freud are particularly fascinating in this regard  Notably Von Neumann talked of finding above zero-sum models such as solar and sharing life critical knowhow that can multiply value in applications unlike consuming up things  In conversation with his wife in 1945, Neumann had been very clear about (what turned out to be0 his last 12 years purpose in 1945. ·         The energy projects we have been working on will make scientists both the most hated and wanted of peoples. ·          One day my work on the computer and tools augmenting human brains will compound even greater opportunites and risks than machine energy.

Due to serving as teenage navigator allied bomber command burma, my father had google maps of coastlines in his heads a generation ahead of other mediators. To dad they offered a different explanation of history’s accumulation of conflicts and cultural misunderstandings.     Surviving world war 2 my father’s 2 intellectual expereinces were Keynes last class – by now as per his final chapter of general theiry keynes was concernced with the probability that a handful of economist would increasing lonk in what futures were possible; reading the centenary of The Economist atempts to help queen victoria to transfomr Epure around Commonweslth anchred round today’s  sdg 2 end hunger; sfd 1 end poverty.   There was a transparency of purpose fitting logics originated by adam smith moral/transparent systems purpose as well as intention of Scottish engineering inventions from steam engine to telephone to television. My father was deeply concerned how often leaps in communications spun corruption or blindness among the most powerful before we the peoples could innovate goods   Both of my family trees were full of Diaspora Scots whose missionary reached bridged nEWs (north East West south).My maternal grandad was Mumbai’s chief justicc over 20 years dialogue with Gandhi with grandads last job writing up legalese of india’s independence; My paternal grandad worked in british embassies mainly collecting intel on the threst of hitler and stalin having himself served in world war 1 when his graduate studies at Heidelberg in divinity were ended by the war;

 

When my father died in 2010, colleagues at The Economist published obituaries and held remembrance parties. Former Science editor Viscount Matt Ridley is typically kind but also surprising to me how little was understood of my father’s 35 years of mediation at the economist before our digital explorations

5 Videos questioning games of 8 billion beings at start of 2010s

11111111111111111111 

Editors at The Economist discuss entrepreneurial revolution and why Norman Macrae supported Bangladeshi Microfinance

222222222222222222

Future History of BBC by Norman Macrae - Unacknowledged Giant of The Economist - what could the world service broadcaster uniquely do for human race if it valued economic purpose as number 1 social business broadcaster?

333333333333333333

At Bronx cable tv of the campus where the UN began in 1945: Rachel McCullough-Sanden, Spencer Chiimbwe, and Christopher Macrae discuss why they are organizers of the Collaboration Cafe in New York City -our man cooperation project for college year 2008/9 invites students to share 10000 dvd copies of why Bangladesh village women have antidotes to being subprimed and risking ever greatest loss of peace and even millennials being first extinction generation - why not celebrate little sisters community empowerment world not big brothers endgame?

444444444444444444

1billiongirls (tropical Asia and the world's poorest) have twice designed the greatest economic development miracles - from 1972 through quarter of a century without electricity on any engineering from mid 1990s when mobile and solar started to connected the world's most innovative platforms for humanity- Muhammad Yunus shares his memories of what began in 1995; compare with 3 other entrepreneurial revolutionaries - the tech wizard family quadirs; the first philanthropist of mobile women George Soros, the world's most extraordinary ebd poverty cooperator Fazle Abed. Bonus ponts for those who dare to explain how Chinese village women scaled parallel human advancements from 1972 and 1995. (If you want to to be millennials sustainability generation know what happened where when - do not let today's politicians stop you from visioning history's greatest moments of human endeavor. We cannot expect the likes of chatgpt to be valid without you.

555555555555555555

2025 report - last cooperation edition - in press 2023- if you need sneak chapters ask chris.macrae@yahoo.co.uk 

The chapters of this book will review seven systemic transformations – a slight simplification of the 9 transformations taht leadership of the UN by Guterres has brought to sensing 17 SDGs. We vision these as cooperation building blocks and will mainly address intended good solutions to them in the 10 clusters shown. In Trying to Unite 8 billion beings' behaviors around 1945's core UN goal of rights beyond borers and inclusion within borders, we will make maximum use of which of 6 era of communications are which peoples & places bridging where and when. 2025’s report in 1984 had been concerned with how the coming of web1,2,3 fitted the histories of human behaviors in tele2, tele1, tele0. Taking web3 as what communications choices we make in the 2020s can map is the overall compass of this book.

Guterres & 2021-3 the most urgent years to collaborate round UN Leadership

 The world is very lucky that Antonio Guterres is leading UN collabs 2022-2023. See his life experience curves and peoples dedication (arguably the second most dedicated servant leader in Franciscan tradition after Pope Francis - before he headed the UN he headed its refugee actions through every community with the urgent crises refugees map; previously he had led Portugal ( he knows what its is like leading a nation, and one incidentally at far end of the EU's comprehension - ed note I helped design the largest every survey of how an EU budget on a nation had been spent in the early 1990s - he was well placed to learn from PEDIP

ON the UN's 75th in 2021 Guterres launched UN2.0, and leapt forward with operational branches of UN's application of Artificial Intel and FinTech

At UNGA in 2021 , Guterres report Common Agenda has earmarked 2023 as the optimal year for the UN to host summit future - in many ways this will be a bottom up complement as cop26-cop28 rolls on. The world is also hugely fortunate that Indonesia hosts teh G20 in 2022 . How else can we help Guterres maximise leadership and grassroots mapping of sdg collaborations

g1:21 COLLABorations

 Since 2007we got some advance notice of subprime-we have merged 2025report.com analysis first made in 1984 with  collabs sustainability millennials research - see eg www.economistwomen.com - we have been trying to map where community collaborations entrepreneurially took back control of their own future sustainability (matching work on that my dad  norman macrae first published in the economist in 1962; with support of eg romani prodi 1976 entrepreneurial revolution; and gifford pinchot intrapreneur 1982)  

urgency multiplies when you consider half-time sdgs 2022=9; guterres timeline 2023 summitfuture:

we have come to the conclusion that the way tech interacts in the 2020s with the 5 primary markets revolving round sdg1-5 times  together with  xfactors (change to green, change infrastructure/commons, where humans give control to machines to run realtime systems ie humansAI  matter most

so we will be paying particular attention to logging up zooms and diary of events round

g1 g2 g3 g4 g5 and these xfactors

we welcome collaborative recommendations chris.macrae@yahoo.co.uk

example

g1:21 12.1 - 

About the Webinar After the success of M-Pesa in Kenya, mobile money leapt to the forefront of development conversations about financial access and inclusion. In the years since, digitalization has proliferated and diversified, from digital payments systems, to digital currencies backed by a central bank (CBDC), to cryptocurrencies. What does this mean for financial inclusion? Which uses of digital money can solve real access and inclusion problems, and which are techno-optimistic “solutions” in search of problems? Join the Financial Access Initiative's Tim Ogden in conversation with Jesse McWaters, the Global Head of Regulatory Advocacy at Mastercard, to explore some basic frameworks for understanding the differences between the rapidly growing types of digital currencies. Through this session you’ll gain a better grasp of new and evolving digital means of exchange, how they interact, and what that means for pro-poor financial inclusion.  We'll talk about how payments systems are different from digital currencies, and how digital currencies are different from cryptocurrencies. Do digital currencies fundamentally change the dynamics of inclusion and exclusion? What does crypto add (or subtract) from the story? What should you be paying attention to, what questions do you need to be asking, and what can you roll your eyes at? Then, we’ll have lots of time for you to ask questions or share your perspectives.  Wednesday, December 15, 9:30am ET (US) Click Here to Register Featuring Jesse McWaters, Global Heal of Regulatory Advocacy, Mastercard   Timothy Ogden, Managing Director, Financial Access Initiative at NYU Wagner This faiVLive is presented in collaboration with the Mastercard Center for Inclusive Growth. Tweet your questions to @financialaccess Click here to register for the webinar Copyright © 2021 Financial Access Initiative, All rights reserved.

 

List of co-hosts:

• Aga Khan University (Pakistan)
• Alive & Thrive (India)
• Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF) (India)
• Helen Keller International (HKI) (Nepal)
• IDinsight (South Asia)
• Institute of Policy Studies (IPS) (Sri Lanka)
• International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh (icddr,b) (Bangladesh)
• International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) (South Asia)
• National Institute of Nutrition (NIN) (India)
• NITI Aayog (India)
• SickKids Centre for Global Child Health (South Asia)
• Standing Together for Nutrition (STfN) (Global)
• Society for Implementation Science in Nutrition (SISN) (Global)
• UNICEF Regional Office for South Asia (ROSA) (Regional)
• World Health Organization South-East Asian Regional Office (WHO-SEARO) (Regional)
• World Bank South Asia (Regional)

https://poshan.ifpri.info/delivering-for-nutrition-in-south-asia-implementation-research-in-the-context-of-covid-19/day-one/

 DELIVERING4NUTRITION 2020

4th edition

nutrition & cov19 

Welcome by moderator

Purnima Menon, International Food Policy Research Institute

Opening remarks by co-chairs

Shahidur Rashid, IFPRI  & Vinod Paul, NITI Aayog

Importance of implementation research for improving programs for women and children in the context of COVID-19 (video)

Margaret Bentley, The Society for Implementation Science in Nutrition (SISN)

Impact of COVID-19 on maternal and child health and nutrition: Global situation analysis

Saskia Osendarp, Micronutrient Forum

Impact of COVID-19 on maternal and child health and nutrition: South Asia situation

Aatekah Owais, SickKids Centre for Global Child Health

Adapting program actions and implementation research to support nutrition during COVID-19: An example from Nepal

Pooja Pandey, Helen Keller International (HKI), Nepal

Q&A

Overview of Conference

Rasmi Avula, IFPRI

Closing Reflections

Vinod Paul, NITI Aayog
Zulfiqar Bhutta, Aga Khan University and SickKids Centre for Global Child Health
Shahidur Rashid, IFPRI

day 2

THEMATIC SESSION 2A: DISRUPTIONS, RESTORATIONS, AND ADAPTATIONS TO NUTRITION AND HEALTH INTERVENTIONS DURING COVID-19

TIME: 23:30-01:00 EST | 04:30-06:00 GMT  | 09:30-11:00 PKT | 10:00-11:30 IST/SLT | 10:15-11:45 NPT | 10:30-12:00 BST

CO-CHAIRS: AVULA LAXMAIAH, NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NUTRITION & RUCHIKA CHUGH SACHDEVA, BILL & MELINDA GATES FOUNDATION

 

Using high frequency health information system data to quantify effects of COVID-19 on disruption and restoration of health and nutrition services in India

Anita Christopher, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI)

COVID-19: Access to maternal health service in informal settlements of Mumbai

Rijuta Sawant, Society for Nutrition Education & Health Action (SNEHA)

COVID-19 adaptations in the implementation of an MIYCN counseling intervention in urban Bangladesh

Santhia Ireen, Alive & Thrive

Tele-monitoring continuity of adolescents and women’s nutrition services in eastern India during and after the COVID-19 lockdown: Results and lessons from Swabhimaan impact evaluation sites

Neha Abraham, ROSHNI – Centre of Women Collectives led Social Action, Lady Irwin College

Social innovations to nudge behavior change in maternal and adolescent nutrition practices across 11 districts of India

Shantanu Sharma, MAMTA Health Institute for Mother and Child

Impact of COVID-19 on iron and folic acid supply chain in India: Interruption in IFA procurement and distribution

Jitendra Singh, Institute of Economic Growth (IEG)

Improvements in IFA supplementation coverage under Anemia Mukt Bharat (AMB): Evidence from Health Management Information System (HMIS)

Archa Misra, Institute of Economic Growth (IEG)

Q&A

THEMATIC SESSION 2B: DISRUPTIONS, RESTORATIONS, AND ADAPTATIONS TO NUTRITION AND HEALTH INTERVENTIONS DURING COVID-19

TIME: 01:30-03:00 EST | 06:30-08:00 GMT | 11:30-13:00 PKT | 12:00-13:30 IST/SLT | 12:15-13:45 NPT | 12:30-14:00 BST

CO-CHAIRS: ROBERT J0HNSTON, UNICEF & NEHA RAYKAR, IDINSIGHT

 

Adaptive implementation of a community nutrition and asset transfer program during COVID-19 pandemic in rural Bangladesh

Yunhee Kang, Johns Hopkins School of Public Health

Delivery of routine maternal and child vaccines and nutritional services in India during the COVID-19 Pandemic

Averi Chakrabarti, University of Pennsylvania

Mobile Interventions for Upscaling Participation and Videos for Agriculture and Nutrition (m-UPAVAN): A feasibility study

Emily Fivian, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine

A digital platform for continuing interface with potential program participants for nutritional and early childhood development counselling even during COVID-19 pandemic

Shashwat Kulkarni, Department of Women and Child Development, Government of Maharashtra

Program impact pathway of the Positive Deviance/Hearth Interactive Voice Calling Program in a peri-urban context of Cambodia

Kate Reinsma, World Vision International

Transitioning from in-person to telephone-based counseling during the COVID-19 pandemic: Lessons from a large-scale, multi-sector nutrition program in Nepal

Indra Dhoj Kshetri, Helen Keller International (HKI)

Q&A

 

THEMATIC SESSION 3: IMPACT OF COVID-19 ON FOOD SECURITY AND THE ROLE OF SOCIAL SAFETY NET PROGRAMS

TIME: 04:00-05:30 EST | 09:00-10:30 GMT | 14:00-15:30 PKT | 14:30-16:00 IST/SLT | 14:45-16:45 NPT | 15:00-16:30 BST

CO-CHAIRS: KD RENUKA SILVA, WAYAMBA UNIVERSITY & DIPA SINHA, DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR UNIVERSITY

 

Impacts of COVID-19 on food and nutrition security on migrant families in Chhatarpur and Sheopur Districts Madhya Pradesh, India

Archana Sarkar, GIZ

Understanding the reality: The pandemic and its effects

Isha Rangnekar, Action Against Hunger

Collaborations that addressed food insecurity during the COVID-19 pandemic

Vinita Ajgaonkar, Society for Nutrition Education and Health Action (SNEHA)

What changed for PDS beneficiaries with the National Food Security Act, and during Covid-19

Mamata Pradhan, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI)

Do ration cards predict ration volumes? Findings from household surveys across six Indian states

Prateek Pillai and Victor Zhenyi Wang, IDinsight

Revision of the wheat flour fortification standard in Indonesia and disruption in its implementation due to COVID-19

Rozy Afrial Jafar, Nutrition International

Recovery and ongoing challenges in food insecurity among Asia Pacific poor households in 2020-2021

Yunhee Kang, Johns Hopkins School of Public Health

Food insecurity and perceived COVID-19 impacts among rural households in Sri Lanka

Nishmeet Singh, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI)

Q&A

DOWNLOADS

Agenda Overview
Call for Abstract
Concept Note

Event Resources

Virtual Background 1
Virtual Background 2

Hear from our co-hosts!

---

CLOSING SESSION: FROM EVIDENCE TO POLICIES, PROGRAMS AND BETTER LIVES: KEY INSIGHTS FROM DELIVERING FOR NUTRITION 2021

TIME: 06:00-07:30 EST | 11:00-12:30 GMT | 16:00-17:30 PKT | 16:30-18:00 IST/SLT | 16:45-18:15 NPT | 17:00-18:30 BST

MODERATOR: PURNIMA MENON, IFPRI

Conference summary

Panelist reflections & way forward

Md. Khalilur Rahman, Bangladesh National Nutrition Council, Bangladesh
Rakesh Sarwal, NITI Aayog, India
Kiran Rupakhetee, National Planning Commission, Nepal
Shagufta Zareen, Policy and Strategic Planning Unit, Pakistan
Renuka Jayatissa, Medical Research Institute, Sri Lanka
Zivai Murira, UNICEF South Asia
Meera Shekar, World Bank
Angela de Silva, WHO-SEARO
Temina Lalani-Shariff, CGIAR, South Asia

Q&A

photosday1

education of pregant women

each stage in development of new born infant

eg first few weeks breast feeding

if get stunted at ay stage cant respond to acute dusease which then begins killer

more dots that continuity whole "education" of child from 0 up and parets or whomever relay through to education/community

childhood wassting -pandemic beyond facade country cn sende to space and produce vaccine but cant end child wasting

wee need health resilient systems community level - impact nutrition , health, women, education - accelerate investment in sdgs now covid has exposed ths lack of fundamentals

last mile health - last 200 yars health frst 12 weeks of infant

anamei sokutions only take weeks to intervene but not done wholly on ground