at an oversimplified level wherever kissinger built intergenerational friendships between nations he did good; everything else he influenced seems to me to be predicated by if he helped the overall peoples of the old USSR make world safer happier- it doesnt matter that I dont know but sometimes I wonder if anyone knows - see eg wilson centre bye to kissinger
in another oversimplification we can divide impacts on the world into those of businessmen and those of public servants (with perhaps a 3rd group pure scientists0; it is possible that kissinger advice over 50 years and top of most administrations has had ore exponential influence of america in the world than any person in living memory - here is one chat which questions this - how would you improve on this starter for 10 kissinger1.docx
=========== in search of peace and war?
110 and 430 years of not learning about wars
i realise wars are contextual ; Scots which i come from and Irish live 80% outside are homeland so goodwill to all is a top priority of how we appply english and other language models; in my family both parents and grandpatents had their college education interrupted by war - so our perhaps selfish defintion: war is a process where elders btoken systems spill blood mainly of youth and where family loving communities are the first losers a dynamic subconsciously or consciously leveraged by vested interests such as big or bad banking/real estate
given tis defintion of war , its important to learn what caused a world war- as far as we can see the 2 top ststemic causes of world war 1; peoples were still so unrepresented by communications engines begun switzerland 1865 that european decision making was done by a club of about 20 powerul decision makers who segented on 2 opposite sides
the actual cause seems to have been the disaster cause when every hisstory designs borders so that some nations are landlocked; what is needed is some sotrt of transnational convention so that shared infrastructure to shipping routes is inveted in between landlocked and coastal nations
world war 1 taught us that a winning side may get rid of bad leaders at top of a place but it cant reassign a peoples place to someone else; in other words a smart criteria of gping to war is whats our plan if we win for places' peoples
given all of this it would seem that morally war should only be started if absolutely necessary - eg my family believe hitler was mad and would have exterminated most people in his way - so war against hitler was justified
another subsidiary hypothesis what is the dominant exchange that a time's world trade is being systemised around if humans the world over dont see /agree that then false wars get started not representing any peoples but the vested interest of that market; in addition if that market isnt traparent about its expoential consequences on nature (as carbon energy rulers have not been) then its likely there will be ever more war, ever less peace
in all of these contexts, when neumann-einstein-turing gave the world brainworking engines they knew this new type of engine would compound threats if it did not resolve all the broken systems that previous engines had spiraled most recently communications engines lauched 1865 worldwide out of switerland's itu
updates month 6 gamifying AI =who advanced humanity who http://normanmacrae.ning.com/forum starting 1951 with Economist diaries of NET - neumann Eisjtein Turing
11/30/23 friends perhaps you could kickstart up a round robin - one best thing for friendships and intelligence that wouldnt have happened without kissinger
in becoming the diary since 1951 of the purposes of brainworlers engines designed by Neumann Eijstein Turing, The Economist imagineered death of cost of distance- ie the day when life critcal intel could be app's between any 2 communities in any hemispehre because in satellite era cost of distance is marginal once the infrastructure exists; and because due to eg those engineers who trustted moores laws (let alone condoleezza rices top 10 tech multipliers for policy makers of 2023 brain cells of computers have been first to analyse and beam data up and down since 4g infrastructure 2009- coincidentally th same date that stanford became the world's epicente of humansai imagenet (neuron networking had been the last lecture notes of the net 1957)
from The Economist 1970s with thanks tp Bard -if you have fav quote why not post it sincerely email@example.com
- "The American rapprochement with China is the most significant event in world politics since the Second World War. It has transformed the international landscape, opened up new possibilities for cooperation, and created new uncertainties."
- "The rapprochement between America and China is not a mere diplomatic maneuver. It is a fundamental change in the world balance of power. It is a recognition that the world is no longer bipolar, but multipolar. And it is a challenge to the existing international order."
- "The American-Chinese rapprochement is still in its early stages. There are many obstacles to overcome, and the future is uncertain. But the potential benefits of this new relationship are enormous. It has the potential to bring peace and stability to Asia, to promote economic cooperation, and to create a new era of global prosperity."
- "The American-Chinese rapprochement is one of the most important developments of our time. It is a testament to the power of diplomacy and the resilience of the human spirit. It is a reminder that even the most intractable problems can be solved through dialogue and understanding."
- "The American-Chinese rapprochement is not a panacea for all the world's ills. But it is a major step forward in the right direction. It is a sign of hope in a troubled world."
These quotes from The Economist reflect the excitement and optimism that surrounded the rapprochement between the United States and China in the 1970s. The two countries had been bitter rivals for many years, but they began to thaw relations in the early 1970s. This rapprochement was a major turning point in world affairs, and it had a profound impact on the course of history.
Henry Kissinger, who was the U.S. Secretary of State at the time of the rapprochement, played a key role in bringing the two countries together. He was a brilliant diplomat who understood the importance of building relationships with China. Kissinger's efforts helped to pave the way for a new era of cooperation between the United States and China.