75 years in a day of Economist Q&A since 1951 with Neumann , Einstein, Turing
40 YEARS MEDIA CHARTERING
London Celebrating AI & Quantum & 6G & Energy --- thanks to lead mapmakers Jensen & Demis & Charles3 .. EJ : : Japan+63 ... MEIM : Millennials Energy Intelligence Mapping
Old home page. -please use web version of our timeless blogs
www.economistdiary.vom Is English Language Modelling intelligent enough to sustain our human species? Great are 1990s Valley startups eg nvidia, musk's and googles exponentially linking much of whats humanly possible with machines engineered billion times mo(o)re maths brainpower than individuall human minds. But 1943 UK future shocks to.o. Geoffrey Crowther Economist Ed started debate keynes: were engineers deeper than economists in locking in futures next gens connect?. 1943 also saw dad norma cambridge studies interrupted serving last days as teen navigator allied bomber command burma. Surviving joyfully hired 1948 by Crowther to mediate engineers like Neumann Einstein Turing & Economist purpose. 3 generations apart, imost unfortunate Neumann-Einstein-Turing all left earth by early 1957: last coding notes Neumann's Computer and the Brain. Economist IQuiz disliked by EU but what to do with billion times more machine brainpower celebrated by Kennedy, & the royal families of UK & Japan. Whence not surprising greatest UK AI startups deep mind & arm influenced by royal societies & Cambridge business park ( crown property) & crick/watson open sources of dna, & cavendish lab 1920s influencing Taiwan's tech grandfather. see part 2 2025report 40 years in inteligence war between bad media and good education agents Countries with good data sovereignty projects rsvp chris.macrae@yahoo.co.uk UK Japan Taiwan India France Saudi UAE Korea S Singapore HK US 1 2

Monday, December 31, 2001

inteligence sdg1 - broken money systems - huge leaps in tech failure to advance for humanity on sdgs

 My father's work at the economist inspired by von neumann from 1951 and my joint workd with dad from 1983's 2025 report hypothsised there was no point in tranforing around technolgy unless there were win-wins for everyone including the poorest and most marginalised histo9rically

some of the un sd goals do ammitedly need more entrepreneurial co-creativity than othersd but there is no excuse for how mioney is designed- paper money and paper recoird keeping had huge transcation and safety costs which have been shpwn by eg kenya' mppesa or banglaadesh's bkash to be applicable to recahing many ofn thise unbanked in paper money world

one has to ask why have multilaterals and others responsible for advancing the human lot failed to bring transparency to worldwide rankings (of where poorest have been included in tech and where they havent

in this context some numbesr from oxfam are alarming - gemini

Oxfam's latest figures on wealth inequality in the United States are from 2023. According to their report, the richest 1% of Americans own nearly half of the country's wealth, while the bottom 90% own just 16%.

This means that the richest 0.01% (or approximately 16,500 people) now own more wealth than the bottom 150 million Americans combined.

While the specific figures may fluctuate slightly from year to year, the overall trend of increasing wealth inequality in the United States remains a significant concern.

No comments:

Post a Comment